Your hyperlink exhibits
Inputs
handle | quantity |
---|---|
bc1q8w6cm5ckwen4yuc79nz8lpp0hu47evj2ky7clv | 0.11065577 |
Outputs
handle | quantity | deduced function |
---|---|---|
3GcMjPrZCv7LNShG8tnAaYa3yTE9y4gwbr | 0.03000000 | Fee |
3CWXMX9ryvybhEec9pFpHHBfkHjy5SefRR | 0.08059097 | Change returned to payer |
Whole | 0.11059097 | – |
The price paid to miners was the distinction between sum of inputs and sum of outputs, 0.11065577 – 0.11059097 = 0.0000648
Every thing appears regular.
An nameless remark to a different reply factors out {that a} Samouri pockets configured to generate Segwit/Bech32 addresses for receiving cash will, for instance, generate P2WPKH change addresses when paying a P2WPKH handle. It does this in order that onlookers can not deduce the aim of every output from its handle prefix. If the second output had a bc1 prefix, its function can be extra apparent. Matching output handle sorts improves privateness. This has no bearing in your drawback.
in Sparrow it exhibits that I truly despatched 0.11065577
Sparrow would not acknowledge the change handle as being underneath its management. This sometimes means it would not have the non-public key for that handle.
May some clarify why 0.08059097 disappeared
That 0.08059097 is change being returned to you. Since your Samouri pockets generated the handle it will know that the cash is returned.
If the keys for that handle weren’t imported into Sparrow, it will not know the second output was your cash.
This means that both the Samouri pockets backup that was imported into Sparrow was non-HD and predated the transaction or was HD however had a really massive hole between seed and alter handle – too many generated however unused keys. Most definitely it means that your course of for “I restored my pockets in Sparrow” was incorrect or defective.
Both approach, Sparrow lacks the important thing generated by Samouri for the change handle. Or perhaps someplace the secret’s related to a descriptor for the unsuitable handle sort.
This could be proof to assist the notion that, in mixture, sweeping is extra dependable than importing?
Can it’s revoreved?
Confirmed transactions are irreversible. This can be a obligatory characteristic of Bitcoin.
You need not reverse it, I consider it’s essential to copy some keys from Samouri into Sparrow that have been omitted in your earlier work.