The dustrelayfee is used to calculate mud thresholds. The change you plan would improve all mud thresholds by an element of 100. This could make transactions with recipient or change outputs of lower than 29,400–54,600 sats (relying on output sort) non-standard. The proposed change wouldn’t improve the transaction charges customers have to pay.
Or a minimum of to pressure a spammer similar to this one to some further Bitcoin in order that as an alternative of paying simply the price they must pay further 13.220kb*0.003BTC/kb=0.039BTC to somebody or to themselves.
It’s not clear to me how you bought to this conclusion. The mud threshold for P2TR is at present 330 sats, and beneath your proposal can be 33,000 sats, 0.008 instances of what you calculated. The linked transaction has a single P2TR output that’s 10,000 sats which beneath your new rule would have to be a minimum of 33,000 sats. Your worth appears to be based mostly on the transaction weight, however the minimal output quantity doesn’t scale with the precise transaction weight.
Given the bigger minimal output quantity, it appears to me that this alteration would improve the minimal HTLC quantity that may be reliably enforced on chain, however aside from that I don’t see how it could hamper LN a lot.
